A major chapter in the ongoing investigation into maternity failings at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) is drawing to a close, as the independent review led by senior midwife Donna Ockenden prepares to stop accepting new cases by 31 May 2025.
This marks a significant milestone in what has become the largest independent review of maternity services in NHS history.
A review born from tragedy
The review was launched in response to a deeply troubling pattern of baby deaths, severe injuries, and maternal harm at NUH, which operates both the Queen’s Medical Centre and City Hospital in Nottingham.
To date, 2,297 families and 859 staff members have come forward to share their experiences—many of them harrowing accounts of loss, neglect, and systemic failure.
The scope of the review is vast, covering:
- Stillbirths
- Neonatal deaths
- Significant brain injuries to babies
- Severe maternal harm
- Maternal deaths
While the review will stop accepting new cases after May 31, Ms. Ockenden clarified that any qualifying cases submitted by that date will still be included, even if documentation arrives in the following weeks.
Spotlight on Ward A23: A symbol of systemic neglect
In a recent letter to NUH Chief Executive Anthony May, Ms. Ockenden raised urgent concerns about Ward A23 at Queen’s Medical Centre, which handles gynaecological emergencies and early pregnancy complications. Descriptions from both staff and families paint a bleak picture of a ward where care was “largely dependent on chance” and the infrastructure was “not fit for purpose.”
More than 30 families have spoken to the review team about their experiences on Ward A23. Ms. Ockenden described the stories as “heartbreaking,” revealing that staff had been raising alarms for years—often to no avail.
“Although promises were made, nothing was done,” she said. “It did take families and staff members coming forward to raise it. To be fair to the trust, it is far up on their agenda now. Things are happening in the here and now.”
A trust responds – but is it enough?
In response to the latest revelations, NUH Chief Executive Anthony May issued a public apology:
“I apologise unreservedly to the women and families for the experiences described in Donna Ockenden’s latest letter. In addition, I would like to say sorry to colleagues within the trust who were not supported properly. These experiences are not acceptable.”
While the trust has pledged to act on the review’s findings, the damage to public confidence is profound. For many families, the apology comes too late.
Looking ahead: A chance for change
The final report from the review is expected in June 2026, and it is likely to have far-reaching implications not just for NUH, but for maternity care standards across the NHS. As the review enters its next phase, the focus will shift from gathering testimonies to analysing evidence and formulating recommendations.
This moment represents both a reckoning and an opportunity—a chance to confront painful truths and build a safer, more compassionate maternity system for the future.
How can we help?
Danielle Young is a Legal Director in our Medical Negligence team, which has been ranked in tier one by the independently researched publication, The Legal 500. She specialises in pregnancy and birth injury claims (including cerebral palsy), brain injury claims, fatal claims, surgical error claims, and cauda equina injury claims.
If you have any questions in relation to the subjects discussed in this article, then please get in touch with Danielle or another member of the team in Derby, Leicester, or Nottingham on 0800 024 1976 or via our online form.
Contact us