The Taylor Review, now called the ‘Good Work’ report, has now been published.
Overview of The Taylor Review
Here is a summary of the proposals on employment law that emerge from the report.
- Keep the distinction between employees and workers, but rename workers who are not employees ‘dependent contractors’
- Amend the legislation defining employees and workers so that case law principles are reflected in the legislation itself – possibly with supporting secondary legislation
- Remove the requirement for workers to have a contract to perform work personally
- Place more emphasis on control in the definition of worker status
- Consider taking account of the subtly different definitions of ‘worker’ in the legislation
- Retain the need for personal service in employment contract
- Amend the law on the National Minimum Wage to make it clear that gig-economy workers allocated for through an app are undertaking a form of output work and will not have to be paid NMW for each hour logged on when there is no work available
- Treat workers treated as ’employed’ for the purposes of tax status
- Extend the right to a written statement of terms to workers as well as employees
- Require written statements to be given on day one of employment
- Extend written statement of terms to include description of statutory rights
- Give a stand-alone right to compensation if employer has not given written statement
- Consider increasing the rate of the National Minimum Wage for hours that are not guaranteed by the employer
- Preserve continuity of employment where any gap in employment is less than one month, rather than one week
- Improve the information to be given to agency workers
- Increase the reference period for calculating holiday pay (where pay is variable) from 12 weeks to 52 weeks
- Allow holiday pay to be paid on a ‘rolled up basis’
- Give agency workers the right to request a direct contract with the end user after 12 months on an assignment
- Give those on zero-hours contracts the right to request guaranteed hours after 12 months
- Require employers to set up Information and Consultation arrangements when requested by just 2% of the workforce rather than the current 10%
- Require larger employers to report on their overall workforce structure – including requests from zero-hours workers for regular hours
- Abolish the ‘Swedish Derogation’ which allows agencies to avoid matching end user pay by employing agency workers in a way that allows for pay between assignments
- Give HMRC enforcement powers in respect of sick pay and holiday pay as well as minimum wage issues
- Allow claimants to being a claim to ET (without fee) to determine employment status as a preliminary issue prior to substantive claim
- Place burden on employer in ET claim to prove that claimant is not an employee / worker
- Give the government the power to pursue the enforcement of Tribunal awards – i.e. pursuing the actual award, not just imposing a penalty for non-compliance
- Allow ET to impose aggravated penalties on employer who does not apply ET ruling on employment status to similar groups of workers
- Allow uplifts in compensation where employer commits subsequent breaches of employment law based on similar working arrangements to those already dealt with by ET
- Consider allowing flexible working requests to cover temporary as well as permanent changes to contracts
- Reform SSP to make it a proper employment right available to all workers – accrued in line with length of service
- Give individuals a right to return to work following long-term sickness absence
Some of these proposals are ‘ready to go’ and others would obviously require a great deal of work to turn them into something specific. For example, it’s all very well saying we need a clearer definition of who is an employee and who is a worker – but what would those definitions actually look like?
Obviously we will keep you up to date on how – if ever – these proposals are actually implemented.
For more information, please contact us via our online form or call 0800 024 1976.