• Accident & Medical Claims
    • Accident Claims
    • Road Traffic Accidents
    • Medical Negligence
    • Asbestos Claims
    • Serious Injuries
    • Funding Your Personal Injury Claim
  • Divorce & Children
    • Divorce & Separation
    • Children Law
    • Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreements
    • Living Together
    • Domestic Violence
    • Same Sex Families
  • Wealth Management
    • Pensions
    • Financial Advice
    • Tax
    • Life Insurance
    • Residential Care Home Planning
    • Trusts
  • Wills & Inheritance
    • Wills
    • Dealing with a Death
    • Inheritance Disputes
    • Powers of Attorney
    • Court of Protection
    • Notary Services
  • Business Services
    • Business Disputes
    • Business Agreements & Contracts
    • Debt Recovery
    • Corporate Services
    • Insolvency Advice
    • Intellectual Property
  • Employment & HR
    • Employer Legal Advice – Managing Your Workforce
    • Employee Rights
  • Property Services
    • House Sales & Purchases
    • Commercial Property
    • Property Disputes
    • Landlord & Tenant
    • Planning Law
    • Construction & Engineering
  • Sectors
    • Education Law
    • Academy Conversion Services
    • Services for Academies
    • Education Training
    • Charities
  • About Us
    • Our People
    • Find Us
    • About
    • Careers at Nelsons
    • News
    • Events
    • Blogs
    • Fusion Legal
  • Pay Online
  • Our People
  • Find Us
  • About
  • Careers at Nelsons
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Fusion Legal
  • Pay Online
logo
0800 024 1976 Email us
logo
For advice and support 0800 024 1976
Email us
  • Accident & Medical Claims

    Accident Claims icon arrow

    Compensation for your injuries

    Asbestos Claims icon arrow

    Asbestos exposure and related diseases

    Road Traffic Accidents icon arrow

    Car, bike, bus and lorry accidents

    Medical Negligence icon arrow

    Advice when you need it most

    Abuse Claims icon arrow

    Abuse compensation claims

    Serious Injuries icon arrow

    Head, brain and spinal injury claims

  • Divorce & Children

    Divorce & Separation icon arrow

    Resolving your relationship issues

    Children Law icon arrow

    Child arrangements and adoption

    Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreements icon arrow

    Drafting and reviewing marital agreements

    Family Mediation icon arrow

    Resolving separation disputes

    Living Together icon arrow

    Legal protection for living together

    Domestic Violence icon arrow

    Protecting you from abuse

  • Wills & Inheritance

    Wills icon arrow

    Making or changing a Will

    Dealing with a Death icon arrow

    Probate and inheritance services

    Inheritance Disputes icon arrow

    Challenging or disputing a Will

    Powers of Attorney icon arrow

    Managing your financial and legal affairs

    Court of Protection icon arrow

    Making decisions for your loved ones

    Notary Services icon arrow

    Witnessing your documents

  • Wealth Management

    Independent Financial Advisers icon arrow

    Investment management planning and strategies

    Pensions icon arrow

    Corporate and personal pension planning

    Cash Flow Modelling icon arrow

    Strategies to calculate your future income

    Tax icon arrow

    Personal tax planning

    Residential Care Home Planning icon arrow

    Planning ahead for your future

    Trusts icon arrow

    Creation and administration

  • Business Services

    Business Disputes icon arrow

    Resolving commercial and business conflicts

    Business Agreements & Contracts icon arrow

    Commercial agreements for your business

    Debt Recovery icon arrow

    Collecting money owed to your business

    Corporate Services icon arrow

    Company law, banking and finance

    Professional Negligence icon arrow

    Compensation for negligent advice

    Restructuring & Insolvency icon arrow

    Corporate and personal, bankruptcy and liquidations

    Intellectual Property icon arrow

    Agreements, trade marks and disputes

  • Employment & HR

    Managing Your Workforce icon arrow

    Managing and supporting your workforce

    Employee Rights icon arrow

    Your rights in the workplace

  • Property Services

    House Sales & Purchases icon arrow

    Get an instant online quote

    Commercial Property icon arrow

    Real estate acquisitions, leases and disposals

    Property Disputes icon arrow

    Resolving property and land issues

    Landlord & Tenant icon arrow

    Services for landlords and commercial tenants

    Planning Law icon arrow

    Planning applications and appeals

  • Sectors

    Construction & Engineering icon arrow

    Contracts and alternative dispute resolution

    Education Law icon arrow

    Legal services to the Education sector

    Charities icon arrow

    Legal support for charities

    Dentists & Dental Practices icon arrow

    Specialist advice for dentists and dental practices

    Manufacturing icon arrow

    Specialist legal support and advice for manufacturers

    Family Businesses icon arrow

    Specialist advice for your family business

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Blogs
  • Individuals
  • Court Of Appeal Set Aside Court Of Protection Decision As Family’s Views Not Fully Considered

Court Of Appeal Set Aside Court Of Protection Decision As Family’s Views Not Fully Considered

Posted on January 5, 2022 at 3:11 pm.

Written by Stuart Parris

This article is for information only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Please consult one of our qualified lawyers or financial advisers for advice tailored to your specific position.

The number of cases appealed in the Court of Protection is minimal and the appeal process is often only invoked in cases where there is a great impact on the protected party as a result of the original decision.

A recent case brought to the Court of Appeal was AH, Re (Serious Medical Treatment) [2021]. The original decision was covered by Vikky Lai and can be read here.

Case background

In summary, the protected party was significantly affected by COVID-19 and required ventilation assistance to remain alive. The case brought before the Court of Protection was whether the ventilation should remain in place or not.

In the first instance it was held it was not in the protected party’s best interests to remain on ventilation forever and it should be turned off once the protected party’s children had the opportunity to be with her, which would then lead to the protected party’s death. This was a particularly difficult decision for the Court of Protection and on reaching that decision Justice Hayden had visited the protected party in the hospital to ascertain a greater understanding of the case.

The protected party’s children were not happy with the decision and appealed to the Court of Appeal. The appeal was brought on the five below grounds, with the appellants alleging:

  • That the Court of Protection did not give sufficient weight to the protected party’s previous wishes that she wanted to receive full treatment;
  • That the Court did not fully consider the protected party’s religious and cultural views in relation to the medical treatment;
  • That the Court did not lay enough weight on the protected party’s past and present wishes;
  • That the Court failed to take into account and balance the impact of the decision on the protected party’s human rights; and
  • That the Judge wrongly used his visit with the protected party to gather evidence in ascertaining the protected party’s views.

The Court of Appeal’s decision

The Court of Appeal held the Judge did properly consider the protected party’s views, history, and the impact of human rights and therefore dismissed the first four grounds of appeal. The remaining ground of appeal however was upheld and led to the case being re-listed. The Court of Appeal held the Judge was not in a position to ascertain the protected party’s wishes when visiting the hospital. In addition to this, it appeared that the family was not given the opportunity to make submissions in the first instance – which they should have been allowed to do – in order to ensure procedural fairness. The Court of Appeal believed that the Judge had erred in the procedure. In order to properly establish what is in the protected party’s best interests, the case will now be re-heard.

Comment

This decision may well be quite significant for relatives of protected party’s. The fact that the relatives’ views were marginalised was a significant factor in the Court of Appeal allowing the Court of Protection decision to be appealed.

The acid test in all Court of Protection decisions of course is that whatever decision is made must be in the protected party’s best interests according to the best interests criteria but in cases such as this, it does not simply mean that the Court must follow medical advice. There are many other factors the Judge is required to consider under section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

As a consequence of this decision, it is also possible that further guidance will be developed in respect of cases where the Judge is to meet with the protected party, as this clearly formed part of the basis of the Judge’s original decision and the Court of Appeal did not appear convinced of the benefit of that meeting.

How can we help Court Of Appeal Protected Party

Stuart Parris is an Associate in our expert Dispute Resolution team.

If you require any advice in relation to the subjects discussed in this article, please do not hesitate to contact Stuart or another member of the team in Derby, Leicester, or Nottingham on 0800 024 1976 or via our online enquiry form.

Contact us
Categories
  • Accident & Medical Negligence Claims
  • Business
  • Charity
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Family
  • Individuals
  • Property
  • Wealth Management
  • Wills & Inheritance
Recent Posts
  • A Wedding Law Shake-Up – An Exciting New Proposal
  • The Role Of Solicitors’ Evidence In Challenging Wills – Two Contrasting Decisions
  • Successful Claim Under The Inheritance Act Of An Adult Child
  • Protecting Your Digital Memories
  • Hull City Council v KF – Court Of Protection Capacity To Decide On Contact With Others

Share this

Related articles

  • Individuals

Hull City Council v KF – Court Of Protection Capacity To Decide On Contact With Others

Read more

  • Individuals

What Is ‘Least Restrictive’ For A Protected Party? Court Of Protection Makes Unusual Decision Not To Move Elderly Patient Out...

Read more

  • Individuals

Protected Party’s Involvement In Urgent Deprivation Of Liberty Proceedings

Read more

See all articles

Request a document we are storing for you

Email us

Join our mailing list to keep up to date with our latest news and events

Sign up
Nelsons logo
Nelsons Derby

Sterne House
Lodge Lane
Derby
Derbyshire
DE1 3WD

01332 372 372
Nelsons Leicester

Provincial House
37 New Walk
Leicester
Leicestershire
LE1 6TU

0116 222 6666
Nelsons Nottingham

Pennine House
8 Stanford Street
Nottingham
Nottinghamshire
NG1 7BQ

0115 958 6262
  • Our People
  • Our Offices
  • About Us
  • Careers at Nelsons
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Fusion Legal
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • GDPR FAQs
  • Client Records Retention Schedule
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Website by Hallam
  • Design by M&D
  • Lexcel logo
Cyber Essentials logo

Nelsons Solicitors Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales (Reg No: 07219010) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Nelsonslaw LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (Reg No: OC335458).  Their registered offices are at Pennine House, 8 Stanford Street, Nottingham, NG1 7BQ. A list of members of Nelsonslaw LLP may be inspected at the registered office. Nelsons Solicitors Limited and Nelsonslaw LLP are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Nelsons Solicitors Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Our notaries are regulated by the Faculty Office. Nelsons Solicitors Limited’s VAT No is 385 184 329.

 

We use the word “partner” to refer to a member of Nelsonslaw LLP and/or a director of Nelsons Solicitors Limited and its use in connection with the business of Nelsons Solicitors Limited should not be construed as an indication that any member or director carries on business in partnership with any other member or director within the meaning of the Partnership Act 1890.

We use cookies to improve your experience of our site (we do not track your identity). To comply with the new e-Privacy Directive we need to seek your consent to set these cookies. If you do not make a selection, we will assume that you consent to the cookies being set. Find out more. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT