What is a judicial review?

Through a judicial review, members of the public or companies can request that the Courts review the decisions and/or actions of an authority performing a public function. In order to use the judicial review process, there must be no other alternative method available to resolve the dispute or all other avenues of resolution must have already been exhausted (e.g. internal complaints procedures).

What are the grounds for a judicial review claim?

There are three main grounds for judicial review claims, which are: Illegality – the state authority acted outside its powers, not understood and/or applied the law correctly, or exercised its power incorrectly (e.g. not based the decision on the facts of the matter in question). Procedural unfairness – the decision is unfair as the public body did not properly observe and comply with its procedural obligations, or it does not give reasons for the decision or it is biased. Irrationality– the action of the public authority is irrational as it is so unreasonable that no reasonable decision-maker could have come to the same conclusion when making the decision, or the decision did not take into account relevant factors or considered irrelevant factors (sometimes referred to as the ‘Wednesbury unreasonableness’ test). Additionally, the Courts can scrutinise whether the state authority has acted in accordance with the relevant legislation, e.g. the Equality Act 2010 or the Human Rights Act 1998. It is important to note that there is a strict time limit in which to bring a judicial review claim, which is generally at the very latest three months from the date of the decision of the public authority. However, there are many exceptions to this rule, which require a judicial review claim to be made more urgently than that. If the Courts decide that the public authority did not act reasonably and in accordance with public law, then the decisions can be declared unlawful. This may then mean that the decision has: To be made again; The public authority can be ordered by the Court to do or not do something; or Damages can be awarded to the claimant/member of the public. It is important that members of the public or companies, seeking to challenge a decision by a state authority through public law or a judicial review, obtain specialist legal advice regarding their circumstances.

Public Law & Judicial Reviews | Expert Legal Advice

Protecting your rights and challenging public authority decisions

Public law (also known as administrative law) allows the Courts to hold public authorities, such as local authorities, educational institutions, health (NHS Trusts) and Government bodies, to account and for members of the public to be able to challenge their decisions via judicial review claims.

Every year, public authorities across the country make thousands of decisions on behalf of the public. The principles of public law mean that these authorities must act reasonably, justly and in accordance with the human rights of those affected (e.g. members of the public) when making these decisions.

Need advice? Contact us to find out how we can help

Public law and judicial reviews – how our solicitors can help

At Nelsons, our team of dispute resolution solicitors in Derby, Leicester and Nottingham are experts in public law and have many years of experience in bringing judicial review claims on behalf of individuals, businesses and non-governmental organisations on a broad range of public law matters.

The process of challenging a state authority decision can be a long, arduous and complex process, so it’s important to obtain experienced and specialist legal advice regarding your circumstances. Our team will guide you throughout the process, providing you with advice and support along the way.

Testimonials…

"Nelsons Solicitors Limited's 'excellent' team has notable expertise in construction, debt recovery, insolvency, professional negligence, IT and intellectual property and commercial property disputes, leveraging the firm's wider practices in these areas where necessary."
The Legal 500
"Nelsons Solicitors Limited fields a wide-ranging practice and has a strong track record in assisting with complex high-value High Court litigation."
The Legal 500
"Nelsons are our go to law firm for England and Wales, they provide pragmatic and commercially aware legal advice. From our straightforward, all the way through to our most complex and high value matters, Andy Rudkin approaches our cases diligently and is always responsive."
The Legal 500 2023
"A company that is able to offer a diverse range of support that a typical manufacturing business requires."
Referee feedback provided to The Legal 500 2024

For more information on public law and judicial review claims, please call our team of solicitors on 0800 024 1976 or via our online enquiry form for a guaranteed response.

Public law and Judicial Review FAQs

What is a judicial review?

Through a judicial review, members of the public or companies can request that the Courts review the decisions and/or actions of an authority performing a public function.

In order to use the judicial review process, there must be no other alternative method available to resolve the dispute or all other avenues of resolution must have already been exhausted (e.g. internal complaints procedures).
What are the grounds for a judicial review claim?
There are three main grounds for judicial review claims, which are:
- Illegality – the state authority acted outside its powers, not understood and/or applied the law correctly, or exercised its power incorrectly (e.g. not based the decision on the facts of the matter in question).
- Procedural unfairness – the decision is unfair as the public body did not properly observe and comply with its procedural obligations, or it does not give reasons for the decision or it is biased.
- Irrationality– the action of the public authority is irrational as it is so unreasonable that no reasonable decision-maker could have come to the same conclusion when making the decision, or the decision did not take into account relevant factors or considered irrelevant factors (sometimes referred to as the ‘Wednesbury unreasonableness’ test).
Additionally, the Courts can scrutinise whether the state authority has acted in accordance with the relevant legislation, e.g. the Equality Act 2010 or the Human Rights Act 1998.

It is important to note that there is a strict time limit in which to bring a judicial review claim, which is generally at the very latest three months from the date of the decision of the public authority. However, there are many exceptions to this rule, which require a judicial review claim to be made more urgently than that.

If the Courts decide that the public authority did not act reasonably and in accordance with public law, then the decisions can be declared unlawful. This may then mean that the decision has:
- To be made again;
- The public authority can be ordered by the Court to do or not do something; or
- Damages can be awarded to the claimant/member of the public.
It is important that members of the public or companies, seeking to challenge a decision by a state authority through public law or a judicial review, obtain specialist legal advice regarding their circumstances.