• Accident & Medical Claims
    • Accident Claims
    • Road Traffic Accidents
    • Medical Negligence
    • Asbestos Claims
    • Serious Injuries
    • Funding Your Personal Injury Claim
  • Divorce & Children
    • Divorce & Separation
    • Children Law
    • Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreements
    • Living Together
    • Domestic Violence
    • Same Sex Families
  • Wealth Management
    • Pensions
    • Financial Advice
    • Tax
    • Life Insurance
    • Residential Care Home Planning
    • Trusts
  • Wills & Inheritance
    • Wills
    • Dealing with a Death
    • Inheritance Disputes
    • Powers of Attorney
    • Court of Protection
    • Notary Services
  • Business Services
    • Business Disputes
    • Business Agreements & Contracts
    • Debt Recovery
    • Corporate Services
    • Insolvency Advice
    • Intellectual Property
  • Employment & HR
    • Employer Legal Advice – Managing Your Workforce
    • Employee Rights
  • Property Services
    • House Sales & Purchases
    • Commercial Property
    • Property Disputes
    • Landlord & Tenant
    • Planning Law
    • Construction & Engineering
  • Sectors
    • Education Law
    • Academy Conversion Services
    • Services for Academies
    • Education Training
    • Charities
  • About Us
    • Our People
    • Find Us
    • About
    • Careers at Nelsons
    • News
    • Events
    • Blogs
    • Fusion Legal
  • Pay Online
  • Our People
  • Find Us
  • About
  • Careers at Nelsons
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Fusion Legal
  • Pay Online
logo
0800 024 1976 Email us
logo
For advice and support 0800 024 1976
Email us
  • Accident & Medical Claims

    Accident Claims icon arrow

    Compensation for your injuries

    Asbestos Claims icon arrow

    Asbestos exposure and related diseases

    Road Traffic Accidents icon arrow

    Car, bike, bus and lorry accidents

    Medical Negligence icon arrow

    Advice when you need it most

    Abuse Claims icon arrow

    Abuse compensation claims

    Serious Injuries icon arrow

    Head, brain and spinal injury claims

  • Divorce & Children

    Divorce & Separation icon arrow

    Resolving your relationship issues

    Children Law icon arrow

    Child arrangements and adoption

    Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreements icon arrow

    Drafting and reviewing marital agreements

    Family Mediation icon arrow

    Resolving separation disputes

    Living Together icon arrow

    Legal protection for living together

    Domestic Violence icon arrow

    Protecting you from abuse

  • Wills & Inheritance

    Wills icon arrow

    Making or changing a Will

    Dealing with a Death icon arrow

    Probate and inheritance services

    Inheritance Disputes icon arrow

    Challenging or disputing a Will

    Powers of Attorney icon arrow

    Managing your financial and legal affairs

    Court of Protection icon arrow

    Making decisions for your loved ones

    Notary Services icon arrow

    Witnessing your documents

  • Wealth Management

    Independent Financial Advisers icon arrow

    Investment management planning and strategies

    Pensions icon arrow

    Corporate and personal pension planning

    Cash Flow Modelling icon arrow

    Strategies to calculate your future income

    Tax icon arrow

    Personal tax planning

    Residential Care Home Planning icon arrow

    Planning ahead for your future

    Trusts icon arrow

    Creation and administration

  • Business Services

    Business Disputes icon arrow

    Resolving commercial and business conflicts

    Business Agreements & Contracts icon arrow

    Commercial agreements for your business

    Debt Recovery icon arrow

    Collecting money owed to your business

    Corporate Services icon arrow

    Company law, banking and finance

    Professional Negligence icon arrow

    Compensation for negligent advice

    Restructuring & Insolvency icon arrow

    Corporate and personal, bankruptcy and liquidations

    Intellectual Property icon arrow

    Agreements, trade marks and disputes

  • Employment & HR

    Managing Your Workforce icon arrow

    Managing and supporting your workforce

    Employee Rights icon arrow

    Your rights in the workplace

  • Property Services

    House Sales & Purchases icon arrow

    Get an instant online quote

    Commercial Property icon arrow

    Real estate acquisitions, leases and disposals

    Property Disputes icon arrow

    Resolving property and land issues

    Landlord & Tenant icon arrow

    Services for landlords and commercial tenants

    Planning Law icon arrow

    Planning applications and appeals

  • Sectors

    Construction & Engineering icon arrow

    Contracts and alternative dispute resolution

    Education Law icon arrow

    Legal services to the Education sector

    Charities icon arrow

    Legal support for charities

    Dentists & Dental Practices icon arrow

    Specialist advice for dentists and dental practices

    Manufacturing icon arrow

    Specialist legal support and advice for manufacturers

    Family Businesses icon arrow

    Specialist advice for your family business

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Blogs
  • Business
  • Reducing Sick Pay For Unvaccinated Staff

Reducing Sick Pay For Unvaccinated Staff

Posted on January 26, 2022 at 8:00 am.

Written by Ella Sheppard

This article is for information only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Please consult one of our qualified lawyers or financial advisers for advice tailored to your specific position.

The majority of employers are looking for new ways to try and best manage the impact of the pandemic upon their business. Having had to ride the wave of Covid-19 for almost two years now, businesses have been forced to assess their ongoing economic viability and are having to keep their financial position under close review.

As part of that, many employers are seeking to reduce business costs associated with the pandemic. One of those obvious costs is the cost of sick pay for those who are off sick with Covid-19, or self-isolating because they have Covid-19, or have been in close contact with someone that has the virus.

With infection rates still fairly high and instances of self-isolation amongst workforces, the total costs of sick pay are potentially becoming prohibitive for many businesses.

Companies cut sick pay for unvaccinated staff forced to self-isolate

IKEA and Next have announced that they are joining the growing list of employers (including Morrisons and Wessex Water) who are opting to reduce employee’s sick pay entitlement to statutory sick pay only, where an employee is self-isolating because they either have Covid-19 or have been in close contact of someone that has Covid-19 and have opted not to be vaccinated against Covid-19.

This has proved to be an emotive topic and one which has caused great debate from both a moral and legal perspective.

However, after these retailers opted to reduce employees’ sick pay entitlement, retailer John Lewis announced that all its staff are entitled to full sick pay for Covid-related absences, regardless of vaccination status, and it would not be “right” to differentiate. Operations director Andrew Murphy said he “cast no judgement” and the firm was “not going to make any change of this type.”

Other retailers, including Sainsbury’s, Tesco, and Asda, have all said that they will continue to pay unvaccinated workers full company sick pay when they are isolating.

Can employers reduce sick pay for unvaccinated staff?

Whilst employers can reduce sick pay for unvaccinated employees, in theory, this does give rise to a number of potential legal issues. We explore some of the risks that ought to be borne in mind by employers when considering whether to reduce sick pay entitlement and/or implement a policy of not paying company sick pay to unvaccinated employees in the context of Covid-19 below.

Discrimination

As a general rule, employers considering reducing unvaccinated employees’ sick pay entitlement will need to approach each instance of this in practice on a case-by-case basis.

Reducing sick pay entitlement for those who are unvaccinated could well have the effect of disproportionately impacting certain groups of the workforce, giving rise to potential discrimination claims.

Current legislation and guidance require individuals to self-isolate in a number of scenarios. However, the requirement to self-isolate has been significantly relaxed for those who are vaccinated against Covid-19 in recent months. For example, individuals who are vaccinated are not necessarily required to self-isolate if they live in the same household as someone with Covid-19 (i.e. someone with symptoms or who has tested positive or has been in close contact with someone with the virus).

Meanwhile, individuals who have exercised their right not to be vaccinated have to self-isolate for a full 10-day period if they live in the same household or are in close contact with someone with Covid-19.

It is recognised that both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals can release themselves from self-isolation after seven full days if they have two negative rapid lateral flow tests (and after five full days with effect from Monday, 17 January 2022). However, this only applies in cases where self-isolation is required because that individual has tested positive for Covid-19.

The requirements remain different in instances where an individual lives in the same household as or is in close contact with someone with Covid-19 (as described above). It follows that unvaccinated employees have a higher chance of being required to self-isolate and are impacted by a reduction in sick pay entitlement. Employees may opt not to be vaccinated because of health reasons (for example, they are clinically exempt owing to a condition that could amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010), or because they are pregnant, or because of their religious or philosophical beliefs. Research has also shown that statistically those from BAME communities are more likely to show vaccine hesitancy or refuse to be vaccinated (see in our previous blog).

As a result, not paying company sick pay to those who are unvaccinated in instances of self-isolation (particularly where this has previously been paid) could well amount to indirect discrimination on grounds of age, disability, pregnancy, belief, or race.

Employers opting to go down this route would need to take into account any mitigating circumstances and be aware of the fact that it may be necessary to recognise and maintain existing sick pay entitlement in certain cases.

Employee relations

Whilst reducing sick pay for unvaccinated employees could encourage the workforce to get vaccinated, doing so could be damaging from an employee relations perspective, particularly given it creates disparity within the workforce.

It could also incentivise employees to be dishonest about the reason for their absence i.e. say that it’s not Covid-19 related and/or attend work whilst they are potentially at risk of infection and pose a risk to others because they cannot afford to stay in isolation or do not want to lose pay putting the health and safety of the wider workforce at risk.

Further, if unvaccinated employees previously enjoyed company sick pay as one of the benefits of their employment, removing that could cause resentment. Employers should bear in mind that benefits are there to be enjoyed, and so removing those from employees because more employees are making use of that benefit might be viewed as a breach of trust and confidence.

Changing terms and conditions

As above, company sick pay may be a benefit that employees enjoy as part of their contract with the business. If this does form part of an employee’s contractual entitlement, then withdrawing that would amount to a change to terms and conditions of employment and an appropriate process would need to be followed prior to doing so. Employers considering this should check their employees’ contractual entitlements as well as the terms of any sick pay policy to see whether they have any discretion within that not to pay company sick pay.

Acas has recently published guidance for employers around making changes to employment contracts and an employer’s associated responsibilities.

This emphasises the need for consideration of alternative potential solutions and meaningful information and consultation with members of the workforce who are affected by the proposed change(s).

Depending on the numbers affected by the proposed change, the requirement to collectively consult with employees might also be triggered, involving strict requirements.

We would advise that employers seek a consensual change in the first instance before seeking to impose any change or follow a dismissal and re-engagement process, although that consent may not be forthcoming given more employees are likely to be self-isolating over the coming months.

Summary

In summary, whilst it is possible for employers to adopt the same approach as IKEA and many other well-known employers have, we would recommend employers give careful consideration and seek legal advice before doing so because of the potential risks involved.

As a starting point, employers would be well advised to undertake a review of their workforce to ascertain numbers of those who are not vaccinated against Covid-19 so that any decision reached is well informed and prepare a list of objective business reasons which could justify the removal of any sick pay benefit.

Sick Pay For Unvaccinated Staff

How can we help

Ella Sheppard is an Associate in our expert Employment Law team.

If you require any advice or assistance in relation to the subjects discussed in this article or any other related matters, please do not hesitate to get in touch with Ella or another member of the team in Derby, Leicester or Nottingham on 0800 024 1976 or via our online enquiry form.

contact us
Categories
  • Accident & Medical Negligence Claims
  • Business
  • Charity
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Family
  • Individuals
  • Property
  • Wealth Management
  • Wills & Inheritance
Recent Posts
  • A Wedding Law Shake-Up – An Exciting New Proposal
  • The Role Of Solicitors’ Evidence In Challenging Wills – Two Contrasting Decisions
  • Successful Claim Under The Inheritance Act Of An Adult Child
  • Protecting Your Digital Memories
  • Hull City Council v KF – Court Of Protection Capacity To Decide On Contact With Others

Share this

Related articles

  • Business
  • Employment

Is The ‘Most Hated Man On The Internet’ In Breach Of UK GDPR?

Read more

  • Business
  • Employment

ICO25 – Empowering People Through Information

Read more

  • Business
  • Employment

Managing Supply Chain Issues & Financial Pressures In The Manufacturing Sector

Read more

See all articles

Request a document we are storing for you

Email us

Join our mailing list to keep up to date with our latest news and events

Sign up
Nelsons logo
Nelsons Derby

Sterne House
Lodge Lane
Derby
Derbyshire
DE1 3WD

01332 372 372
Nelsons Leicester

Provincial House
37 New Walk
Leicester
Leicestershire
LE1 6TU

0116 222 6666
Nelsons Nottingham

Pennine House
8 Stanford Street
Nottingham
Nottinghamshire
NG1 7BQ

0115 958 6262
  • Our People
  • Our Offices
  • About Us
  • Careers at Nelsons
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Fusion Legal
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • GDPR FAQs
  • Client Records Retention Schedule
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • Website by Hallam
  • Design by M&D
  • Lexcel logo
Cyber Essentials logo

Nelsons Solicitors Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales (Reg No: 07219010) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Nelsonslaw LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (Reg No: OC335458).  Their registered offices are at Pennine House, 8 Stanford Street, Nottingham, NG1 7BQ. A list of members of Nelsonslaw LLP may be inspected at the registered office. Nelsons Solicitors Limited and Nelsonslaw LLP are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Nelsons Solicitors Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Our notaries are regulated by the Faculty Office. Nelsons Solicitors Limited’s VAT No is 385 184 329.

 

We use the word “partner” to refer to a member of Nelsonslaw LLP and/or a director of Nelsons Solicitors Limited and its use in connection with the business of Nelsons Solicitors Limited should not be construed as an indication that any member or director carries on business in partnership with any other member or director within the meaning of the Partnership Act 1890.

We use cookies to improve your experience of our site (we do not track your identity). To comply with the new e-Privacy Directive we need to seek your consent to set these cookies. If you do not make a selection, we will assume that you consent to the cookies being set. Find out more. Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT